From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jun 2000 09:08:11 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] Fences at UXO sites |
From: "Uyesugi, Daniel - AEPI" <DUyesugi@aepi.army.mil> Enforcement, education, a supportive public and needed physical barriers are all part of any effective physical security plan. Each should be considered as mutually reinforcing and not mutually exclusive. Education is one very appropriate element, but patrolling, "demonstrated" enforcement (detention and legal penalties), and physical barriers and lights where/when needed based on an assessment of threat (external) and risk (internal) are key elements of physical security. These security measures also need to be tailored, flexible and responsive to each site. Patrolling, enforcement and movable barriers provide flexibility, are cost effective and can be focused on specific sites/areas of threat and/or risk. On the other hand, permanent administrative chain link fences and lighting instead of field concertina with patrolling and effective enforcement "for deterrence" are very expensive and time consuming to install and maintain. They also restrict general access to the public and do little to restrict access to individuals deliberately trying to gain access to the area. One very simplistic example of an "attractive nuisance" precedence is the privacy fence, regardless of height and lighting, around your backyard swimming pool. It is rarely an effect deterrence if you are not home to observe and enforce the barrier. On the other hand, a large dog patrolling or leashed inside and a "beware of dog" sign does significantly deter all but the most determined intruder swimmers. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at http://www.cpeo.org/lists/index.html. If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to: cpeo-military-subscribe@igc.topica.com ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] The Army's ITR Process at Aberdeen Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] ComPACT letter on California S.B. 324 | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Fences at UXO sites Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Fences at UXO sites |