| From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
| Date: | 8 Nov 2004 23:38:55 -0000 |
| Reply: | cpeo-military |
| Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] Dugway Proving Ground expansion |
The case of the proposed expansion of the Dugway Proving Ground raises some interesting questions, since Dugway is an operational range. If the Defense Department ever wins passage of legislation that would to exempt munitions and related chemicals from regulatory oversight on such properties, what happens to the legal obligation to respond on a parcel that is contaminated now, is not yet an operational range, but which may become one? Lenny -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
References
| |
|
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Dugway Proving Ground expansion Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Beaufort buffer approved | |
|
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Dugway Proving Ground expansion Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Army destroys "mustard" shell | |